Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Influential businessmen of India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Influential businessmen of India

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subjective title and no inclusion criteria, so apparently original research. How influential does a businessman have to be to get listed? And how is "influence" measured? Category:Indian businesspeople already includes the relevant articles neutrally. Masaruemoto 02:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:LIST. Lists must have a clear inclusion criterion. -- B figura (talk) 03:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete original research to decide who is influential and who is not Corpx 04:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmanageable. Could in theory be a category but the problem woluld still arise from the word influential with the inevitable original research on defining who is influential and who isn't. Fails to be encyclopedic Pedro | Chat  07:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Keb25 18:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pedro et al. Accounting4Taste 22:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.