Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Info.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. JERRY talk contribs 03:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Info.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete someone blanked the page, ignoring process, but this article is sourced only to its own website and seems nn. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per nom. The generic name makes it difficult to find third-party sources, and since none are provided, it fails WP:V and WP:N and should thus be deleted.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The partnerships that are vaguely alluded to in the article constitute enough of a notability assertion to avoid speedy deletion, but since there are no sources and no hint of how deep these partnership goes, the article should not be kept. Keep Reliable source was added. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 19:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Some media references are listed at http://info.com/media_comments If these are confirmed, they would demonstrate notability. --Eastmain (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added references from PC World and PC Magazine. --Eastmain (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, per reliable sources added to the article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.