Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoVaticana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

InfoVaticana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to pass notability criteria for either organisations or for websites. Other than an interview in El Mundo, the article does not list third-party sources that would mention this website. Its apparent claims to notability lie in the fact that some of the website's contributors are notable. — kashmīrī  TALK  10:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I agree that the current article is much too heavily sourced to its subject, the article in El Mundo appears to push this topic over the notability threshold. Barely.  But there you have it.  A loose noose (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * We normally require multiple sources for a standalone article to pass WP:N. Additionally, sources should be independent from the subject, which an interview with the founder is not (even if published in mainstream media). See also WP:SECONDARY. Cheers, — kashmīrī  TALK  09:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I found a good deal of secondary coverage of this website in WP:RS, added a couple of bits to the article. WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY as reliable sources references have been added to the article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.