Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infobip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:RELIST, only three relists should occur. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Infobip

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  04:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is sourced to a combination of press release announcements and blogs; I'm not finding sufficient WP:RS references to meet the WP:CORPDEPTH criteria. AllyD (talk) 09:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep It is now sourced to articles by a national business daily, an independent regional daily and the national chamber of economy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upanishadee (talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  05:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  08:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Being one of the world's largest SMS service providers is notable. 1292simon (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 05:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  talk to me! 05:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Four relists is a joke, just close this thing... Carrite (talk) 06:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.