Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infoecology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Infoecology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable topic with no mainstream coverage Alexbrn talk 08:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (speak)  @ 12:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I also did not find any mainstream coverage. In addition, the only source was not in English. It's possible that this article was created to promote the subject. &mdash; Σosthenes 12  Talk  18:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12


 * Delete We have an article on Information ecology as defined by the knowledge management and library science folk. But this article is a seeming WP:COATRACK for advertising the Infoecology institute. As far as I can tell, that institiute is not notable; I was unable to find multiple reliable secondary sources for the topic or institute. Without multiple reliable RS, this topic falls below notability threshold, per WP:GNG, and should be deleted. --Mark viking (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No notable coverage of topic. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 00:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.