Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Security Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) -- intgr [talk] 11:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Information Security Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:PEACOCK article exclusively based on WP:PRIMARY sources. Sources available in the article do not satisfy WP:GNG for significant coverage in multiple independent sources (nor WP:ORG which basically boils down to GNG). -- intgr [talk] 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC) -- intgr [talk] 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn: some further edits by User:Txqy1760 introduced sources that appear sufficient to establish notability. Though I'm still baffled by how few mainstream press articles there are about this organization, especially if you believe all the puffery that was written in the article about how important it is. -- intgr [talk] 11:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.