Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Tetanus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Information Tetanus
Delete. Original research. IceKarma&#x0950; 04:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete violates No original research -- T B C ???   ???   ??? 04:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Blnguyen 05:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that the phrase enjoys any sort of wider usage than something someone made up in school one day. Ikkyu2 05:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfunny joke, original research at a stretch.  (aeropagitica)   19:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 19:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR and unverifiable neologism. The phrase doesn't make much sense anyway (why tetanus?). -- Mithent 01:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, patent nonsense. Pavel Vozenilek 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.