Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information continuity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Rob e  rt  04:33, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Information continuity
Was tagged for {prod} (reason: No sources, few relevant google hits) but the original author removed it. Renata 05:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can't provide a better source than "I've heard of it," but I have.  It's a topic of great concern among medical informatics types.  Ikkyu2 05:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep medical information term. Arbustoo 06:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've put information on the article's talk page with citations indicating that it is a valid concept. &mdash;ERcheck @ 15:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, relevant and useful topic. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 00:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * A little bit of a newbie here - sorry for deleting the original removal tag. I appreciate the helpful reference additions. We (health informatics physicians) are using this term routinely with other health care organizations that we seek to exchange data with; it helps create understanding about patient expectation - that their health information be where they are whenever and wherever it is needed. --Taeytan 22:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is an emerging term of great importance as we shift to electronic medical records and greater transparency for patients.
 * Keep...for all the reasons listed above.
 * I have added a nice reference from British Medical Journal brought to my attention and co-written by a colleage (who now works at) at Group Health Cooperative, which describes "Informational Continuity" as a part of "Continuity of Care." --Taeytan 21:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.