Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information mapping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Information mapping

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

undue promotion of a registered trademark and copyright protected method associated with main author (Robert E. Horn)
 * * fgnievinski (talk) 21:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioral science and Education. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 02:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The writing is terrible, in that marketroid way, and the term "information mapping" is used in many other contexts, e.g., How Information-Mapping Patterns Determine Foraging Behaviour of a Honey Bee Colony, Surface-Based Information Mapping Reveals Crossmodal Vision–Action Representations in Human Parietal and Occipitotemporal Cortex, Geomorphological information mapping of debris-covered ice landforms using Google Earth, etc. "Information map" is also used in various senses. I'm tempted to call WP:TNT on this one. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 02:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This specific documentation technique appears to only have been written about by Robert E. Horn, who is the author of the citations here. I cannot find evidence that this particular technique was picked up by others. The term is used in other contexts, but this article is about this one specific technique which does not appear to have gained adherents. Lamona (talk) 03:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Making it official: dubious notability, writing that calls out for WP:TNT. I don't think the "registered trademark and copyright protected" status matters in this context (we have plenty of articles about books that are still under copyright...), but this article is just not worth holding onto regardless. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Science. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.