Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information patent

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:44, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Information patent
Neologism. Does not deserve an article (yet). The sole meaningful occurence I found is. It shouldn't even be a redirect towards software patent to my opinion. The same apply to the expression "data patent". Unless otherwise proven... --Edcolins 21:46, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Non notable expression. JoaoRicardo 06:58, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.Mikkalai 07:57, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced from a reference on IP law. Gazpacho 06:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)