Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informavore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Stifle (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Informavore

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Transwikied article, that only consists on dictionary content. Speedy deletion per CSD A5 was denied. If kept, please focus on subject rather than on the term Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 11:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It seems like non-dictionary content on this is available, and it looks like a notable term.  (I thought it was a neologism at first, but apparently not.)  It definitely needs expansion away from being a dicdef, though.  Anturiaethwr (talk) 13:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - dictionary content is not a reason for speedy deletion. CSD A5 applies to content that has been transwikied to Wiktionary only. Neıl  ☎  14:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Informavore was transwikied to wiktionary 04:26, 7 February 2007. I realize that given the timespan, the use of A5 it is up for debate. – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 15:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The page does not exist as a full page on wiktionary - it's sat in their transwiki holding pen, still, which is why I couldn't find it .  It seems like it could be readily expanded beyond a dictionary definition, so keep. Neıl  ☎  19:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.