Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infosecpedia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 09:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Infosecpedia
Does not meet WP:WEB. Does not come close. Does not have an Alexa ranking, so not in top 100,000. Google indicates only 3 sites even link to it, and one of those is this wikipedia entry. It deserves a footnote at best. Being a wiki does not procure notability. FSRdomo 03:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -/- Warren 06:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Peephole 11:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the precedent set by the recent deletion of many articles on wikis, such as Encyclopedia of Stupid and Kamelopedia. MER-C 13:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Ruaraidh-dobson 15:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable website. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm an admin on Infosecpedia. The site is not, IMO, notable enough to warrant an entry, and it's pretty much unmaintained now (have a look at recent changes). &mdash; Matt Crypto 20:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources per nom. Z iggurat 01:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.