Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infotel.co.uk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Infotel.co.uk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant  (talk)  01:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * '''Delete per nomination. Bzweebl (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

References via third parties are continuously being sourced and added to on an ongoing basis. — Thaliarmy78 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep.User:thaliarmy 09:46, 20 February 2012


 * Delete: I had previously nominated the article for deletion. Firstly it lacks third party reliable sources, it also sounds promotional IMHO. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 06:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.