Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infowars.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Yanksox 01:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Infowars.com

 * Delete non notable website. conspiracycruft Strothra 23:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, second biggest site of the most notable cospiracy theorist. Obvios that nominator is not aware of what is and what is not notable in this field, considering he nominated prisonplanet.com as well --Striver 23:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Article closed as keep less than two weeks ago Articles for deletion/Infowars.com. Nom has presented no new argument that requires a renom at this juncture. -- JJay 02:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a consensus keep 2 weeks ago. Right now, nothing exists at Speedy keep to change the ability of people to close AfDs early if an article was AfD'd recently, please consider going there and helping change that. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 15:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - nominating an article for the second time in two weeks after a "keep" consensus seems borderline bad-faith. --Hyperbole 21:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced by the time the AFD finishes. Calling the previous nom a consensus keep is also disingenuous. Kotepho 22:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Source? Source what, that the website exists?--Striver 00:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, it was closed a consensus keep. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 00:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable conspiracy theory website. - CNichols 23:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It should be brought to the attention of all participating in this debate that Jeff Rense, What Really Happened, Prisonplanet.com, and Dissident Voice have all been proposed for deletion at this time, in addtioin to the current article. Furthermore I'd like to add my opinion that nominating an article for deletion less than three weeks after it was previously nominated should be considered disruption of the project. __meco 08:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per recent AfD. Give it a few months and try again if you still have concerns.  Nacon kantari  13:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Alexa rank 12k + the previous keep. However, not a speedy keep. Stifle (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, we already have an article for Alex Jones. We don't need separate articles for his websites. KleenupKrew 23:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.