Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfraWare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

InfraWare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see nothing to suggest better notability and improvement here and my searches found no particularly better sourcing here, here, here and here all being the best results. The article seems to have been started and edited by the subject themselves and what's more is it has not been improved since December 2008 thus nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister  talk  05:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software company article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Only refs provided are press releases. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - purely a promotional piece with no RS. Delete per nom and above editor.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.