Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingo Giezendammer

Person in question appears to be mostly unnotable with a total of ~2 Google hits on someone else's personal page. Possibly vanity. -- Grunt 22:12, 2004 Jun 20 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. DJ Clayworth 17:00, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Definitely not notable. He's listed on the "List of Neo-Dadaists" that's also being considered for deletion.  You know who else is on that list?  The already-deleted Lennie Lee!  Delete with extreme prejudice, thereby creating a new form of performance art. - Lucky 6.9 17:10, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely notable.  Google is not God. anthony (see warning)
 * Delete - Google may not be god but Ingo is not notable. - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  01:18, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Have you even heard of Ingo before this? I can't think of a more notable graphic artist.  anthony (see warning)
 * I've never heard of Ingo Giezendammer. Are you sure you don't mean Ingo Giezendanner?
 * This guy is listed as a performance artist, not a graphic artist. I'm convinced it's part of a spamming effort on behalf of "Lennie Lee." - Lucky 6.9 16:23, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Gary D 08:42, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)