Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Keep" votes don't put forward any policy-based arguments for retaining the article, instead focusing on WP:ILIKEIT-esque personal recollections and vague talk of a 'border'. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Ingrid Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as it seems she's likely best known for about 60 episodes of Go Girls and there's nothing to suggest keeping a separate article; the best my searches found only this and this. Pinging past user, interested subject users , and  as well as New Zealand users , ,  and. SwisterTwister  talk  22:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak to medium keep. I didn't watch Go Girls, but I remember her from Burying Brian and Street Legal. She's borderline, perhaps, but above the border rather than below it IMO. Grutness...wha?  23:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: the NZ On Screen ref is not independent, since it's a government funding NZ-film promotion agency. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Neutral: on the notability of the subject. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The reason why I am keeping it because she used to be on Shortland Street playing the Evil Mackenzie Choat. I remember seeing her play Britta's mother Fran McMann and also Go Girls used to be my favorite show. --Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Can't find anything on her, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG, (I've just realized it looks like she passes NACTOR.). – Davey 2010 Talk 09:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity - the actress herself made a few dozen edits. MiracleMat (talk) 08:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * While I wouldn't really condone someone editing an article about themselves, the majority of what she did was to turn a raw list into a table, and to collapse two sections into one more well-edited one. The article was already there - at close to its current length - before she started editing it, and if I wasn't aware of the editor's name, I wouldn't have guessed it fell under WP:COI. Not really what would normally qualify as vanity posting. Grutness...wha?  04:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep similar to Grutness, borderline but just over the border, for notability. MurielMary (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, as above weak, but still a keep. Mattlore (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.