Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Rivera Rocafort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Ingrid Rivera Rocafort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person seems to be the head of the Puerto Rico tourism office... and that's about where it ends. I fail to see the notability. Midas02 (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BASIC since several independent reliable sources cover her exclusively:  . &mdash;Ahnoneemoos (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Disclaimer? You might wanted to have noted that you were the writer of this article, so you're not entirely objective in this matter. GNG is an issue here. Both sources you're giving only cover the strategy of the tourism office, NOT the person. And the first source is only a local newspaper, the second one a vague local website. Not much in terms of quality coverage. --Midas02 (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Primera Hora, El Nuevo Día, and Caribbean Business are printed and well regarded newspapers with wide distribution in Puerto Rico... GNG is not an issue here at all, she satisfies it easily. Me being the creator of the article is irrelevant to the discussion, GNG does not care if I'm the creator or not. &mdash;Ahnoneemoos (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable. Besides the sources cited above, Chamber of Commerce, Recognition by the First Lady yes I get that it is one sentence, but recognition nonetheless. confirmation hearing showed wide support of her qualifications, prior business history. Easily meets GNG, multitude of news coverage about her and her tourism projects, but I have included mostly biographical links. SusunW (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The PRTC isn't just a tourism office. A little digging helps you understand how it is a liaison between the government and business in Puerto Rico. I started out not knowing anything about PRTC or Rivera, but after doing some research to see if she was notable, found out that she's a very major player in Puerto Rico! She makes decisions that help keep a major, million-dollar industry going. She's certainly notable. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite: The thing sounds like a hagiographic biography; my first glance was " looks some PR firm wrote this for their web site, delete," but there IS widespread coverage (though I don't read Spanish, I shall AGF on the assessment of those who do).  She passes GNG, but I do think the tone is too promotional.   Montanabw (talk)  04:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Megalibrarygirl. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.