Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Skjoldvær


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Ingrid Skjoldvær

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Akin to the leader of a youth wing of a political party, this person has led a youth environmental organization. Only for a year and without considerable impact in Norwegian public life - yet. Of the 5 current references 4 are primary sources and 1 is trivial coverage (my news desk). While I don't doubt that there are several other news pieces mentioning her, she is not notable enough yet Geschichte (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

If the main issue with this source is the lack of secondary sources, then I can try and fix this. Would you be willing to give me a few days to rewrite the article to include information from secondary sources that improve notability? After that, you could reassess for notability - if it is still not notable, then I would understand the article's deletion.

The main reason that the article is largely dependent on primary sources is due to it being largely a translation of the Norwegian article, which uses roughly the same sources. However, I'm sure more rewrites would make this article notable. Sound okay? - OliverEastwood (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment, hi, as this is a translation from the Norwegian WP, see here, it needs the appropriate attribution (see WP:TFOLWP). Coolabahapple (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * and afds usually run for 7 (or more) days before being closed so you have some time to find sources, oh, and welcome to wikipedia and the (murky?:)) world of afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 03:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This needs a discussion of the sources that were added.
 * Hi there, I've added secondary sources and information to improve notability, and have slightly expanded the article. Could someone please re-review for notability? I reckon the article is now notable enough to avoid deletion. Thanks very much - OliverEastwood (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Pinging, who is newish and may not realize his attention is still needed here. Oliver, Jo-Jo Eumerus is asking for a discussion of the sources you've added. You also should formally !vote, which involves posting a comment that starts with Keep (three apostrophes, Keep, three apostrophes will produce a bolded !vote of Keep), as those are the opinions the person closing the discussion will be most closely assessing. --valereee (talk) 10:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: Skjoldvær has had a leadership role in several prominent Norwegian environmentalist organisations, one of which (Folkeaksjonen) has taken notable action, including a lawsuit against the Norwegian government, as well as its actions leading to the creating of an area which is permanently protected against oil drilling. References have also been updated to reflect this notability - several reputable news sources have been added. In light of this, I believe that the lack of notability (which this AfD was created to address) has been sorted, and the article is of a high enough quality to keep. -  OliverEastwood  talk  10:55, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.