Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingrid Storholmen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No other than nominator suggested deletion of the article plus nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  10:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Ingrid Storholmen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't look like a notable author to me. What do the other Wikipedians think? Note: Of course I don't know what kind of an award "Sultprisen" is. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 06:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Keep – Storholmen has been covered in the Norwegian media for winning the Sultprisen (which is an award given by Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, a large Norwegian publisher) as well as English reviews of her poetry. I think the reviews by The Hindu and The Sunday Guardian shows this figure meets GNG. Altamel (talk) 07:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - NyNorsk Wiki lists other awards given to Storholmen, and as Altamel rightly notes, her appearance in newspaper reviews as well as her prizewinning works are more than sufficient to meet our notability standards.


 * Ole Vig-prisen 2011
 * Legat og stipend 2011
 * Tanums kvinnestipend 2011
 * Bokhandelens forfatterstipend 2010 Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I withdraw the nom, hoping that someone will spare a few minutes of their Wikitime to add smt from those sources, for example the awards, to this 2-sentence stub. Thanks. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm adding some refs and bibliog. to the article now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.