Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inheritance Abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS 23:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Inheritance Abuse
Deleted on prod, disputed after the fact. Prod rationale was "This article does not follow NPOV. It contains blatant opinions, and/or original research." From myself I can add that there are WP:NEO and WP:COI issues in play as well, see. Procedural, abstain. - crz crztalk 01:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per previous reasoning on prod and nomination. I don't see a possible way this could be made NPOV or be done without original research. Seraphimblade 01:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Never heard of the term, though I suppose the phenomenon it purports to describe has some relation to reality.  If reliable sources are provided, I will reevaluate, of course, but I suspect there is unsalvageable original research here. · j e r s y k o talk · 02:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete', as I originally suggested the delete 2 months ago...--Vox Rationis 02:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Note also that the title is incorrectly capitalized. Doczilla 05:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC) P.S. I agree that the article creator's comments at indicate violation of WP:COI in creating the article. Author has vested interest in spreading the use of the term. Doczilla 08:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates NPOV, possible original research, not encyclopedic. J I P  | Talk 05:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Drake Dun 08:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. I am familiar with the field, and have never seen this; there's nothing here that couldn't be addressed at, say, will contest or testamentary capacity.  An inappropriate extension of psychobabble.  - Smerdis of Tlön 15:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete--Rudjek 19:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Smerdis; I'm an estates and trusts lawyer, and I've never heard the term "inheritance abuse".  The concept could not possibly be NPOV.  Coemgenus 20:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.