Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkerpor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:11, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Inkerpor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, google search doesn't turns out any significant news sources, clearly fails general notability. Meeanaya (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I disagree that it is non-notable. It has a local singificance. That company took over the factory, workforce and brand dating back from 1953. In 2010. Croatian Museum of Arts and Crafts even held the exhibition called "Sjaj i bijeda Jugokeramike" (Gloss and Misery of Jugokeramika) dedicated to products manufactured there during the socialist Yugoslavia. The factory used to employ several thousand people during that period and it was a first major factory opened in Zaprešić after World War II. Its products can be found all over the world (as the Net.hr article says, they export products to: Italy, Germany, Austria, USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australia etc.). Their web page also says that they are nowadays: "the only Croatian manufacturer of high temperature porcelain tableware." . In order to understand the significance, I would say that one needs to know the local historical context. Franjo Tahy (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure what the criteria regarding this situation are, but Inkerpor appears to be the successor to Inker and Jugokeramika, which were definitely notable companies.  Daß &thinsp;  Wölf  03:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.