Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkstains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 22:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Inkstains

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Was planning to PROD this but that has aparently been tried already and the author simply removed the tag with no comment. The article basicaly fail all notability criteria, there is no mention of any coverage by any 3. parties. There is one reference to a band profile site where they say they are working on it and who is involved but that is aparently the extent of what is know about it. Sherool (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:CRYSTAL. — Rankiri (talk) 15:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Third parties address WP:CRYSTAL dual third party verification plus artist declaration. NA already established, I will personally develop article post release, no point having a future albums template if we are not allowed to use it. Iforgetsorry (talk) 01:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC) - — Iforgetsorry (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * From WP:CRYSTAL: All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. From WP:NALBUMS: All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The listed references don't seem to satisfy WP:RS. — Rankiri (talk) 03:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Given that you've conceded album would likely (given NA status; definitely) warrant an article after release it seems the logical conclusion is that the future album status is warranted. Since it's a stub article and it's a NA nothing is gained through deletion. It's tripled referenced... two third parties one in print form, how many other future album stubs are tripled cited for a stub?Iforgetsorry (talk) 07:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - I do not see the wide coverage that would establish this album's notability in advance of its release. -- Whpq (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS. No tracklist, no definite release date. talking  birds  14:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.