Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inky, Blinky, Pinky, and Clyde


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete and redirect to Pac-Man. - Mailer Diablo 03:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Inky, Blinky, Pinky, and Clyde
non-notable — J3ff 09:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, but not for the reason it was flagged. They ARE notable, but they're already in the article on pacman--TaeKwonTimmy 09:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Already covered on Pac man page. I wouldn't even redirect since the chance of looking for this exact title is negligible.Obina 10:05, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per TaeKwonTimmy and Obina. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 11:18Z 
 * Delete. content already covered in more detail in the Pac-Man article. Evil Eye 12:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Superfluous; the main article does just fine. PJM 13:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Would a redirect be useful here? - Mgm|(talk) 13:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes. Redirects are cheap. Average Earthman 20:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Already in the Pac-Man article, and the characters have had no life or influence otherwise. Also, the writing in the entry is rather, well, childlike. -- Tenebrae 21:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pac-Man. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 04:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pac-Man -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 07:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect. They are certainly notable, but belong in the main article. Going with (weak) redirect not delete as there is a finite chance someone could be searching for "Blinky Pinky", for example. Turnstep 22:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I just re-edited the page to something more useful (and accurate - the original version had the personalities and colors of the monsters all wrong), but it still duplicates the information found on the main Pac-Man article. Delete if you like.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.