Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inman Hunter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Inman Hunter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability. Can not find sources supporting "top TV editors" in England. Ariconte (talk) 03:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep Nominator's objection to this article consists solely of his/her inability to find sources supporting "top TV editors" in England and a claim that, simply because of this, Hunter lacks notability! Yet, there is plenty of other stuff in the article to support notabily. However, now that the offending phrase has been edited out, presumably the nominator will withdraw. Emeraude (talk) 19:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I strongly concur with Emeraude; there's more than enough to show notability here. Keep it. DS (talk) 14:23, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.