Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innate differences between the sexes

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Coffee 10:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Innate differences between the sexes
I believe this article does not contribute any facts related to the differences between the sexes. If I did, I would suggest the material be merged into Sexual dimorphism. If the title was not unwieldly, I would suggest deletion of content and a redirect to same. As it is I nominate it for deletion. I only stumbled across it while looking at Random Articles. David Henderson 02:58, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Delete.  Christy747 03:02, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is at best original research, so WP:NOR, but is largely the musings of someone thinking out loud. -Splash 03:50, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * delete. It may or may not exist, depending on who you ask... come on. If the first line doesn't decide it for you then I'm not sure what will. Simply not encyclopedic. Mmmbeer 03:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing of any great value here. Capitalistroadster 06:03, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. In its present form - there is, I think, room for expansion in various ways that would make merging into Sexual_dimorphism_in_humans unnecessary. Dlyons493 09:44, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing to be salvaged here. Pavel Vozenilek 18:23, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and fix it. As written now it sucks, but this is a Wiki.  It should be left to encourage people to expand it into a worthwhile article.  The topic is certainly worth covering; I've gone looking for this very thing on Wikipedia before, and been frustrated by the lack of info. Penelope D 01:49, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge (if any) and Redirect to a split off Sexual dimorphism in humans - I like neither the title nor the current content, but the subject should be covered. -Acjelen 01:58, 25 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.