Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innate intelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Innate intelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominated via a related AfD, Articles_for_deletion/Universal_intelligence. Since all sources are chiropraxy-related, one can forget about GNG, let alone MEDRS (and the article is dangerously close to making medical claims). I suggest a very selective merge to Chiropractic, extending a bit the summary offered in Chiropractic ; if your opinion is to merge, please specify its target and extent. Tigraan Click here to contact me 15:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete good lord this article has existed in this sorry state for 11 years. If it is not a WP article by now it is never going to be one; right now it is mostly WP:OR and non-independently source in-bubble nonsense.  Jytdog (talk) 03:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The main Chiropractic article is more than sufficient to cover this particular brand of green-ink nonsense. Whatever material might be truly indispensable -- somehow -- can be put there. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 21:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.