Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innerview


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Statler Brothers discography. j⚛e deckertalk 00:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Innerview

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More than 30,000 results about the album. But that is because of the songs and re-listing of discographies. The band is notable, but I am not convinced that the album is notable.  Occult Zone  ( Talk ) 17:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Opinion I personally can't see the point of these 'track-listing' articles. Album articles that give interesting or valuable information about their subject, yes. But do we need a track listing for every single album that every artiste or band that is notable enough for an article? I think not. As the article stands, any notability for this album is dependent on the notability of the artistes. Yes, they are notable. Is this? Again, I think not. A redirect to the band's article would do quite well until someone comes along and tells us more about this album - and gives references for what they post. Peridon (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Statler Brothers discography. Article reached 12 on the US country chart, but this article itself doesn't demonstrate album's notability. I'd redirect it until RS can be found, if at all. PaintedCarpet (talk) 23:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 19:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.