Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innova Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Primary schools in Singapore . j⚛e deckertalk 23:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Innova Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN primary school. We don't generally provide stand-alone articles for such schools, absent a level of coverage not present here. Epeefleche (talk) 16:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Woodlands, Singapore per long-standing precedent stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Primary schools in Singapore or Innova Junior College per established consensus for non-notable primary schools. Philg88 ♦talk 06:31, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Primary schools in Singapore per long-standing precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES -  which  is simply  a review of the facts as they  are and neither a policy  nor  a guideline. Nevertheless, the 100s of redirects in  the 'R from School' cat are ample evidence alone of the way  the community  has generally  agreed to  treat  such  creations. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:15, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most exceptional elementary schools are presumed non-notable. (Does this really need to run through AfD?) Carrite (talk) 20:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No, it doen't, and per policy, summary redirects are perfectly admissible. Pushing everything throough AfDs when an accepted alternative is available is borderline disruptive.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.