Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovacom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Innovacom

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Since June 2017 Innovacom fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for companies and organizations. --Dirge Jesse (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Completing nomination on behalf of newly-registered account--above text is copied from article talk page. As for my own view, provided references are press releases and/or passing mentions.  They appear to be a quite active company, but my initial searching didn't turn up any reliably-sourced material about them which would satisfy WP:NCORP or WP:GNG.   For future AfD nominations, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO.  Thank you.  --Finngall talk  22:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  23:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  23:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk  23:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The firm is notorious mainly thanks to the ventures it supports; which is the purpose of a private equity firm. Its inherent notability is more obvious from French reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zulu (talk • contribs) 08:15, February 11, 2021 (UTC (UTC)  — Zulu (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * I found lots of mention of the company as part of material about other companies, mainly (as noted above) press releases which carry little weight here. Can you point us to a non-PR article about Innovacom in English or French or any other language? --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk  22:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Innovacom page in French fully respects Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Innovacom page in English remains useful for Non-French speaking members (Disclaimer: I work for this company ; yet it remains an honest comment!) Frederic Humbert (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As different-language Wikipedias operate independently of each other and each sets its own policies and guidelines, an article's existence on fr-wiki does not in itself justify an article on en-wiki. --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk  22:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree - and the French Wikipedia doesn't have the equivalent of WP:NCORP either. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 22:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Nearly closed this as delete but could do with another 7 days to see if a clear consensus forms either way.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, most are announcements and PR and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 22:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.