Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovation and its Discontents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Innovation and its Discontents

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to meet the relevant notability guideline. No indication of notability and no sign that the book is notable GDallimore (Talk) 13:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a couple of references which show that the book meets criteria #1 of WP:BK. --JD554 (talk) 13:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Book is notable and meets WP:BK, per JD554. -FrankTobia (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep — was reviewed in The Economist, Scientific American, Newsweek, The New York Times, as well as by many scholarly publications. It is also assigned reading at a number of universities. As such easily and obviously meets notability requirements #1 and #4 at WP:BK. --Fastfission (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.