Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Solutions In Space


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep/withdrawn. Better sources than I found were available. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Innovative Solutions In Space

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

By my WP:Before fails WP:NCORP and the WP:GNG. The sources that I could find were either press releases or insignificant coverage. The references in the article are self-published so per WP:NEXIST I looked only beyond. gidonb (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 14:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 14:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 14:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 14:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I added some external sources and extra information to the arcticle. The page is still a stub, however imho a marketleader on the nanosatellite market is notable enough to be on wikipedia. Other simular companies are on wikipedia too, like Planet Labs for example. There are already a bunch of links to this page from other pages, however there are many more to come as the page is relatively new so other, older, pages lack the link to ISISpace. Vuurkillertje (talk) 13:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Apparently, it has launched 101 satellites. It seems notable to me. Rowan Forest (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.