Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative communications alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as a non-notable joint venture, with only a single good source, which fails to verify its importance. Ample chances to improve the article have failed. Bearian (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Innovative communications alliance

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

What notability does an agreement between two companies have? It is just an interoperability agreement; thousands of such agreements are there in place. In fact, similar agreements exist between MS and other companies like Cisco et al, and I'm sure even Nortel would have. What has the partnership resulted in? Till now, just an outline of how the interoperability will proceed. Thats suitable for a press release, not an encyclopedia article. soum talk 10:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spellcast (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Reads like a press release, but more importantly there's no clear claim for notability. Alberon (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to a small mention in the articles of Microsoft and Nortel. Redirect could go to either, with a note on the talk page of the other for GFDL purposes. Xoloz (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nortel and Microsoft are working together to create solutions that join together hardware and software solutions to integrate today's voice, video and date communications systems. I defy you to tell me what you learned from reading this sentence without quoting its words. Please make my "solution" with ethanol, thanks. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.