Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovision (festival)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Barkeep49 (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Innovision (festival)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reads like a advertisement/press release, no improvement on this status since 2017. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I have found that this nominator has AfDed 9 Articles, 7 PRODs and 6 CSDs. of articles in a particular Category:Technical festivals in India I strongly believe WP:BEFORE was not done despite being clearly advised to so on Helpdesk.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , I have reviewed this article again as requested, and have decided this AfD should be kept. The article is definitely a press release in my eyes, with content including a very large list of events composed solely of advertising language. For example, take this snippit from the Run IO Hackathon section: With developer talks and guest lecture, this is a one of a kind hackathon which eastern India has never seen. This event aims aim to bring together individuals with a diverse set of talents from the vast talent pool of this country under one roof to brainstorm together and develop sustainable solutions to real-life problems.. This reeks of advertising, with language like One of a kind and vast talent pool of this country.
 * This is only one section, I strongly recommend reviewing the entireity of the events section to see the problem i'm getting at here.
 * Problems in other sections exist too, with advertising language in almost every section, and the majority of sources being the event's own website, various list sites, and the sites of associates like eastindiacomedy.com. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * you can be WP:BOLD and remove sections that you feel are poorly written and poorly sourced if that is a concern. As long as there are sources that can prove teh notability of the topic, the AfD does not make sense. So please judge the notability and then take a decision on withdrawing the AfD or standing by it. some for other afds where you pinged me. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  21:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.