Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inolyst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as spam, spam, green eggs and spam. Blueboy96 22:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Inolyst

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested speedy, non-notable company, no GHits of significance, no GNews/Books/Scholar hits GregJackP (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. A7 or G11, take your pick. The last edit by the creator brought the article into this shape, and no improvement has been done since. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Only self-published stuff on Google Search, and three very old hits (LA Times classified ads) on GNews, which must be from a different company. Favonian (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Speedy contested by whom? A single-purpose account obviously made for the occasion. This is spam. Haakon (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.