Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insecticons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Decepticons. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Insecticons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This grouping does not establish independent notability. TTN (talk) 23:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 23:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to List of Decepticons. BOZ (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of Decepticons. Article is poorly sourced and consists almost entirely of fancruft and original research. This isn't a wiki. sixty nine   • speak up •  01:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It kind of is :) Josh Milburn (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * LOL at Josh Milburn - I didn't want to be the one to say anything. ;) BOZ (talk) 04:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of Decepticons - fails the notability guidelines for a standalone article through a lack of coverage in reliable sources. -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 02:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge per fails notability. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge per previous editors, doesn't need a stand-alone article DarjeelingTea (talk) 19:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.