Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Artists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Inside Artists

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of significance, fails the general notability guidelines. A Google search brought up lots of false positives, but no coverage of this magazine in reliable, independent sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Newly published, no coverage outside of itself demonstrated. May yet become notable, but not so far. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 21:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just established, only very few publications become notable from the very start. This one is way WP:TOOSOON. --Randykitty (talk) 10:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.