Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Opinion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Inside Opinion

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced stub, no sourcing found, deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - No independent secondary sources located to demonstrate notability on Google, Newspapers, Wayback - only listing in TV guides. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.