Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Philanthropy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawing as nom. (non-admin closure) WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Inside Philanthropy
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Not enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Finance, Companies, Websites,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's extremely widely cited and well respected for accurate and unbiased news about the charitable sector. As DGG said in the previous AFD six years ago, "major resource in its field. It is difficult to use the GNG for periodicals or serious websites." And as Arxiloxos said, "As its steady citation by other reliable sources shows, this has become a significant source for the charitable sector, and thus passes criteria #3, #4 and #5 of Notability (media)." -- Softlavender (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If DGG thought it was notable, that's good enough for me. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.