Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insides Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete --W.marsh 01:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Insides Music
vanity article about a nn indy record company, see Articles_for_deletion/Bryce_Beverlin_II for more info. RasputinAXP talk contribs 20:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * tough one, because an online-only indie "label" would not meet WP:MUSIC, but could conceivably be notable and musically important. However, this particular one has few google hist, and its most prominent release is a series of prank phone calls, so... delete.  bikeable (talk) 21:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Bikeable. --Hurricane111 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * In the absence of verifiable notability (at least to date), delete Guy Hatton 07:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity/advertisement. Postdlf 01:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.