Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insidious: The Dark Realm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Insidious: The Dark Realm

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The film should not be a mainspace article until principal photography commences per WP:NFF. No sources to back up the film title or poster. Existing draft article at Draft: Untitled Insidious sequel should be edited and improved until filming commences instead. KaitoNkmra23  (talk!)  11:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Cardei012597 (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Jesus Christ, they are making another one of these?! It's stupid enough that they were continuing the Paranormal Activity series this year. Well, it's a horror franchise, and I guess I know by now from Halloween, Friday the 13th, and Nightmare on Elm Street that Hollywood will milk the nipple of any pop culture horror monster for years on end even if it makes no sense to. Anyway, Merge to Insidious (film series). 👨x🐱 ( Nina Cortex x Coco Bandicoot ) 02:44, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't they make another one? The last one had a budget of $10 million and grossed $167 million.-- Mike 🗩 18:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

*Draftify Film will definitely be notable closer to release, merging or deleting would lose the history. No need to start over once it's released. Donald D23  talk to me  22:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Changing vote to Delete per KaitoNkmra23  Donald D23   talk to me  12:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This draft has been in draftspace for over a year, the article at hand has been created very recently with little reliable sources and/or notability, along with repeated and irrelevant sources, along with incorrect and speculative information. The existing draft should be used instead. KaitoNkmra23   (talk!)  10:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete until we have some significant coverage from reliable sources.-- Mike 🗩 18:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.