Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insite Security


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The case for lack of notability made here seems stronger than the case for notability. That said, if someone thinks they can bring the article up to snuff, drop me a line and I'll userfy it. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Insite Security

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Despite the numerous sources (which are mostly of the company's owner being interviewed about crime), I don't think the subject company has been shown to be notable per WP:CORP. Given the article history (previously created by an account with the same name as the company), I also suspect some self-promotion here. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As nom said, appears to have some self-promotion, and the secondary sources only cover statements made by the founder regarding subjects other than his own company. &mdash;  scetoaux (T | C)  21:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - The business described is notable for being the only business performing these services in this outsourced manner. The sources quote the principal of the business actually doing his job, not talking about the business. Citations seem to match the services being described. This business is not well known, but the service it provides does seem well-covered and relevant.--Amigdal (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be non-notable. An important service, but not enough 3rd party coverage.Yobmod (talk) 10:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:CORP notability guidelines.--Finalnight (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.