Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspection in China


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Philg88 ♦talk 05:18, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Inspection in China

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is some random unsourced musings of the value of inspections to foreign businessmen because of the difficulty with quality control in China. Suspiciously, the original author's only other contributions to Wikipedia has been an article on a company which specialises in quality inspections in China for foreign businessmen, and the speedily deleted Inspection service in china. Just can't see anything in there worth saving. --Legis (talk - contribs) 10:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Inspection in China as a general topic can be notable, but not in this state. With the use of a company infobox (worst at giving a specific headquarters address and key person) and some sources redirects to a bid object in Alibaba.com, it is too much advertising. WP:G11 or WP:TNT.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 11:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete it because there are a lot of problems on the page. PinballWizard29 (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Delete: I can't dispute the fact that article are often kept on the basis of notability, but this one in question is a mess. Deletion is the best decision. Wikicology (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  17:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:50, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.