Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspector Chingum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Inspector Chingum

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 17:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation,  and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Added a few things. If judged insufficient, redirect to Motu Patlu. Again, I am inviting the nominator to PLEASE slow down nominations of Indian animated series or to directly and boldly redirect them to obvious related articles if they think apparent notability issues need to be addressed urgently. THANK YOU. Taking a page to Afd with a minimal rationale may take some time but checking sources, improving the page, verifying potential targets, etc, also does. - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  23:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I prefer not to boldly redirect articles to other articles because I believe in the significance of discussion and reaching consensus. M S Hassan (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Fair enough! Thank you for your comment. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  09:19, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would not redirect to Motu Patlu because that page segment too has no sources, no inline citation and possibly contains original research. I would have redirect to the production company if they had a page with this spin-off in the list of production. Reviewing the sources, the indepth coverage is insufficient and fails general notability guideline. RangersRus (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep the English sourcing is borderline-sufficient for GNG, and there appears to be Hindi-language coverage as well. It might be better to merge with Motu Patlu, but I'm not familiar enough to have an informed opinion. Walsh90210 (talk) 18:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.