Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insperity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America1000 15:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Insperity

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All WP:LISTED organisations are not directly notable. Insperity is such company that it doesn’t realise WP:NCORP policy I feel. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies,  and Texas.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There are sufficient references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. For example, analyst reports such as this from Zacks and there are other references under the previous name Administaff.  HighKing++ 21:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete despite claims of passing NCORP, the sources here are all WP:MILL and press releases. Name change being reported is not coverage and I can't find anything remotely substantial about the company. CUPIDICAE💕  19:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Analyst reports are not WP:MILL and in general are accepted to meet ORGIND and CORPDEPTH.  HighKing++ 10:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.