Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instant (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Instant (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable and unsourced. Band is notable, but album doesn't seem to be. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 06:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: Album reviewed by Allmusic. Mattg82 (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you think that a single review at "allmusic.com" makes the article notable enough to include in Wikipedia? I don't see how this satisifies WP:NOTABLE. Generally, topics are only considered notable if they have received coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: The Ex are notable for their work with some of the most well known avant garde and alternative rock artists (e.g., Tom Cora, Tortoise and members of Sonic Youth) as well as some of Ethiopia's most famous musicians (including Getatchew Mekuria). This album is in this lineage of collaborations: Han Bennink's presence alone it a noteworthy contribution to European free jazz, and with the rest of The Ex's discography making its way onto Wikipedia, why omit one album from their chronology? Morganfitzp (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This is not about The Ex being notable. It's about this album being notable. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Clearly notable band, album has coverage in the Trouser Press Record Guide and Allmusic. Print reviews will certainly exist given the band's stature.--Michig (talk) 06:28, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.