Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insticator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  17:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Insticator

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deprodded article. I'll let my prod text speak for itself: Apparently non-notable company. The references are a mix of name checks, non-independent content, unreliable sources, press releases, and regurgitation of press releases. Searches at Google Books and Google News did not reveal any substantive coverage I could see in published, reliable, secondary, independent sources on which a demonstration of notability for the topic could be bolstered. Note the redirect at Insticator Inc.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I've looked at several of our competitor's pages and all of them have similar sources. We are a growing and verified company. We will continue to add more sources as we gain more press. For the time being, these sources are diverse, and offer different information regarding our company, therefore should not be subject to deletion. WDorceus (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob 13 Talk 02:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article with a clear WP:COI given the comment above. Text and references describing start-up funding for a proposition do not demonstrate attained notability, nor does inclusion in the Red Herring North America: Top 100 for 2017. Nor are my searches finding anything to indicate that this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.