Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Knowledge and Information


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 05:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Institute for Knowledge and Information

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It was felt that my prod was premature. Nothing has happened to the article in ten days so I say "non-notable". -- RHaworth 03:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with non-notable. Even the creators' web pages (here and here) don't mention it. ObfuscatePenguin 05:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Should be speedied, as it doesn't assert notability. Reads like spam, no refs, etc. Google returns no relevant hits. Spam for a made-up organization? faithless   (speak)  06:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions.   -- Gavin Collins 11:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:SPAM. --Gavin Collins 11:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delele - Even if just on the grounds that it is a rubbish article. It tells you nothing. What is it? Where is it? What references are there? Any one of them would be grounds for deletion on top of non-notable. Ben W Bell   talk  20:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I put the material there having removed it from the KM page to give the group a chance to make it something.  As they have done nothing it should be deleted--Snowded 14:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable WP:ADVERT. Doctorfluffy 17:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.