Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute for Sustainable Communication


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Institute for Sustainable Communication

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable company per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are lots of online references and citations to this nonprofit that can be seen through Google Scholar and Google Books. I added some as references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I looked at the sources you added and I see them as trivial mentions. SL93 (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete – I can't identify anything that supplies the organization with substantial coverage. The occasional "according to the Institute for Sustainable Communication" is not enough to establish notability, particularly under NCORP. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:56, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of independent and reliable references. There's not any assertion of notability. here.Brayan ocaner (talk) 08:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources in the article or in searches. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 16:03, 11 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.