Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Development of Skills and Talent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Institute of Development of Skills and Talent

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

That article was already created and deleted a year or so ago by WP:PROD. The same editor recreated it again; it is probably against the spirit of PROD to renominate it, but the institution is no more notable now that it was before.

I considered speedy deletion, but as an educational institution, it is not covered by WP:A7, and IMO it does not quite raise to the level of WP:G11. Tigraan Click here to contact me 09:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Not a lot can be gleaned from this enterprise's rather boilerplate website, but it appears to offer school-level exam coaching. My searches are returning basic social media accounts but no independent coverage to indicate notability whether by WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any independent reliable sources, and the circumstances around this seem like a WP:PROMOTION violation. - GretLomborg (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.